Oviompt
Booking · Q3 2026 · scoping new intents
§ 01 — Work

A private register.
Not a showcase.

The Oviompt register is private by default. Engagements ship under NDA; the decision document goes to the buyer, not the marketing page. We don't keep a logo wall, we don't run a testimonials carousel, and we don't publish numbers we can't show the working behind. What follows is how to evaluate the studio anyway — and how to ask for references.

01.a Why this page is short

Most studio sites lead with case studies because they are the easiest thing to fake. Logos, screenshots, fabricated metrics, screenshots of staging environments — the genre rewards polish, and the polish rarely survives a buyer's diligence call. We've decided not to play.

Three reasons the register is private:

  1. NDAs are real. Most of the work we take on involves regulated data, internal tooling, or pre-launch product. Buyers don't sign with studios that publish their playbook a week after delivery.
  2. Numbers without working are theatre. "+38% pre-trade research time" reads well and means nothing without the baseline, the cohort, the measurement window, and the sign-off. Putting numbers on a page is easy; defending them in a procurement call is not. We'd rather have the second conversation.
  3. The decision register is the deliverable. Every engagement produces a written register of decisions — what we built, what we refused, what we'd do differently. That document goes to the buyer. It is more valuable than a case study because it is honest, including about what didn't work.
01.b What you can read in public
§ 02Method
How we work

Six principles, five process stages, the rules we don't break. The method is the specialism — read this first.

§ 04Writing
The playbook in essays

Long-form notes on shipping AI, design systems, build-vs-buy, and pricing. The writing is the proof.

§ 03Studio
Pricing, in USD, on the page

Every engagement tier with a band, a duration, and what is and isn't included. No "let's hop on a call to discuss budget."

§ 05Trust
How to verify the studio

Verifiability questions buyers ask, and how we answer them — including how to request a reference call.

01.c Engagement shapes we take on

In place of a logo wall, here are the shapes of work we take. If your intent rhymes with one of these, the conversation gets specific quickly.

Shape · 01 — First Ship MVP

A working v0.1, in 6–14 weeks, for a first-time founder.

Decisions documented, telemetry on day one, a 90-day support window after handoff. Built to be picked up by an in-house team or kept on a small retainer with us if needed.

Shape · 02 — Multi-surface build

One product across web, mobile, desktop, and AI surfaces, in 14–40 weeks.

For teams whose product needs to be in more than one place without translation drift. Spine — our internal design system — keeps tokens, components, and decisions consistent across surfaces.

Shape · 03 — AI in regulated settings

Grounded retrieval, citation-strict outputs, audit trails risk officers actually approve.

For finance, legal, healthcare, and enterprise SaaS where "the model said so" is not an answer. The retriever is the product. The model is replaceable.

Shape · 04 — Audits & service engagements

Fixed-fee, 1–4 weeks, with a written decision document at the end.

SEO/AEO audits, workspace setup (Google Workspace, Microsoft 365, Zoho), cloud setup (AWS, GCP, Digital Ocean, Utho), n8n automation, Microsoft Dynamics extensions. Smaller windows, same posture.

01.d References on request

If you're seriously evaluating an engagement, file an intent. After a first conversation we can — with permission — put you in touch with a buyer who has worked with us recently and is willing to take a 20-minute call. We don't publish names; we ask, we get a yes, and we make the introduction. That is how the register stays private and how trust gets built anyway.

Currently booking · Q3 2026

A new register entry
begins with an intent.

Submit intent